Directs the state homeland security department to address cartel threats using its existing lawful authority; states that the measure does not support an asylum claim.
Drug cartels and state homeland security
At a glance
Statute- Does it raise taxes?
- No new tax.
- Estimated cost or revenue
- Not yet verified
- Who pays
- Not yet verified
- Where the money goes
- Not yet verified
- How long
- Not yet verified
Worth knowing: No quantified fiscal analysis verified.
From the Arizona Secretary of State and the state’s fiscal analysis. Estimates are the state’s, not ours.
Your choice
Saved privately on this device.What your vote does
Keeps current terrorism and homeland security law.
Does not expand the department beyond lawful authority.
How the money works
Check the official analysis for how it’s repaid.
Cost, who pays and where the money goes are in “At a glance” above.
What your guides say
No guides selected yet. Pick guides to compare.
Why they disagree
Supporters say it sends a clear message that organized drug trafficking is terrorism.
Supporters (summary)Opponents say a label without money or resources accomplishes little, and the broad wording could reach groups that help migrants or people in recovery.
Opponents (summary)Who’s funding it
We haven’t loaded campaign-finance filings for Proposition 317 yet. You can look them up directly:
Sources
- Arizona Legislative Council
Official analysis: Proposition 317 · ballot-facts
Checked Oct 31, 2026 - Arizona Secretary of State
2026 election source · ballot-facts
Checked Oct 31, 2026